Passive House
Evidence Worksheet
Compare selected PHPP and test values with verified project criteria without assigning Classic, Plus, Premium, EnerPHit, or PHI Low Energy Building certification.
Who it's for: energy consultants and architects checking PHPP and test values at design development against a verified project criterion.
—
How to use this calculator
The formula
Worked example
When this estimate will be off
- Does not calculate PHPP results, choose a demand/load path, climate criterion, treated floor area, PER boundary, renewable-generation requirement, or certification class.
- Does not evaluate cooling/dehumidification, comfort, moisture, components, renewables, commissioning, documentation, quality assurance, or scheme-specific exceptions.
- Airtightness must use the required test method and stage; the worksheet does not validate the test.
- Only an accredited certification process can establish the final class or award.
Frequently asked questions
A common mistake: Does not calculate PHPP results, choose a demand/load path, climate criterion, treated floor area, PER boundary, renewable-generation requirement, or certification class.
Those outcomes depend on the complete applicable criteria, renewable-generation and energy paths, calculation conditions, evidence, and certification review—not three numbers alone.
The applicable value can depend on the selected standard, version, building category, climate, and alternative path. The responsible team must verify that context.
It records a statement from the certification workflow; it does not turn this worksheet into a certificate or independently verify that statement.
Sources
- Passive House Institute — Criteria for Buildings, Version 10c — official extended criteria and calculation/documentation conditions valid with PHPP Version 10
- Passive House certification guidance — official certification information and certifier pathway
This free Passive House Criteria Checker is built and maintained by DataDrivenAEC, using the relevant codes and standards. It does not substitute for professional judgment.