Resource search

Search DataDrivenAEC

Open the full search page →

TestFit

AI-powered real estate feasibility platform for site planning

Generative design platform that automates site planning and feasibility studies for real estate development. Instantly generates thousands of optimized building layouts based on zoning, parking, unit mix, and financial constraints, allowing teams to evaluate design options in seconds.

$22M raisedGrowth Stage
Founded 2016 · 6,600+ users evaluating 1,500+ deals per week
Website →← All Tools

Why This Tool Exists

The Problem

Real estate development teams spend weeks manually creating and comparing site plans, tediously calculating parking ratios, unit mixes, and yield metrics. Traditional feasibility analysis delays crucial go/no-go decisions and wastes resources on designs that may not maximize land value.

The Solution

Automates site planning using generative design to create thousands of layout options in seconds. Optimizes for zoning compliance, parking efficiency, and financial metrics (yield on cost, cut/fill volumes). Enables teams to test design variations and make rapid feasibility decisions. Integrates directly with Revit to streamline transition from feasibility to design documentation.

How You Use It

Delivery Method
SaaSPlugin
Integrations
RevitAutoCADSketchUpZoneomicsESRIThornton Tomasetti TT Core Studio
Project Phases
Pre-Design, Schematic Design, Design Development
Project Types
Commercial, Residential, Mixed-Use, Industrial

Data Transparency

Exactly what this tool uses and how

Input
What it needs
Required:Property parcel or site boundary, Zoning parameters, Unit mix or building type requirements
Optional:3D terrain/topography data, Parking requirements, Cost assumptions, Schedule integration
Formats:CSV, Drawing files, Map data (GeoJSON), Parcel shapefiles
Output
What you get
Format:Interactive design scheme comparisons with cost and efficiency metrics
Fields:Building layouts and floor plans, Parking configuration with stall counts, Net rentable square feet (NRSF) and efficiency ratios, Yield on cost and financial metrics, Cut and fill volumes for earthwork cost estimation, Unit mix and apartment count variations
Algorithm
How it works
Model:Proprietary generative design engine (not machine learning-based)
Accuracy:Not publicly specified (claims algorithm designs building diagrams in milliseconds)
Privacy
How your data is protected
Retention:Project-based retention duration (specific period not publicly specified)
Training:Not publicly specified
Compliance:Standard Contractual Clauses for international data transfers, GDPR and CCPA compliance stated
API
Integration
Endpoint:Contact vendor for API access
Method:Not publicly documented

Use Cases

  • ·Rapid site feasibility and go/no-go decision making before land optioning
  • ·Zoning compliance testing and highest-and-best-use optimization
  • ·Multi-family residential development with unit mix variations
  • ·Mixed-use and commercial project feasibility analysis
  • ·Parking efficiency optimization and cost estimation
  • ·Earthwork cost estimation through cut/fill volume analysis
  • ·Architect generation of multiple code-compliant design schemes for client presentation

Pricing

Free
Free trial available (no credit card required)
Pro
Urban Planner: $100/month, Data Maps: $400/month, Site Solver: $10,000/year (all billed annually)
Enterprise
Enterprise: Custom pricing with volume discounts, SSO, and quarterly business reviews
Sources & Research NotesResearch date: 2026-02-01
Fields Checked (19)
problem, solution, deliveryMethod, integrations, disciplines, projectPhases, projectTypes, yearFounded, maturityStage, customerBase, fundingTotal, input-required, input-optional, output-fields, output-structure, algorithm-approach, control-features, pricing-all-tiers, useCases
Not Found (6)
algorithm-model-specific, algorithm-accuracy-metrics, privacy-data-retention-days, api-documentation, soc2-certification, iso27001-certification
About this research: This record summarizes the cited sources and fields checked. A research date does not establish hands-on testing. Consult the original sources for current details and limitations.