Resource search

Search DataDrivenAEC

Open the full search page →

Structured AI

AI QA/QC agents that review construction drawing sets for code compliance and cross-discipline clashes

AI platform that scans 2D PDF drawing sets (no BIM model required) for code violations, spec deviations, and cross-discipline coordination conflicts, returning findings tied to exact pages and locations. A separate Revit integration runs the same checks against the live BIM model, reporting results by element ID and level. Oxford-founded, Y Combinator-backed (F25); partnered with MEP engineering firm Syska Hennessy Group during development.

$4.2M seed round (announced June 2026), $5M total raised; led by FCVC with Y Combinator, 20VC, Cherry Ventures, Zero Prime Ventures, Transpose Platform, and Sequoia Capital's Scout Fund participating raisedEarly Stage
Founded 2025 · Named on vendor site: Syska Hennessy Group, GPD Group, BGE, Axiom Builders, SJB, 4Creeks, Auld & White Constructors, Kleinknecht Electric Company. ~10-person team (Y Combinator profile); a third-party estimate (Latka, unverified) puts ARR near $440K
Website →← All Tools

Why This Tool Exists

The Problem

Engineering firms manually red-pen architectural, structural, and MEP drawing sets for code compliance and cross-discipline coordination errors on projects with drawing sets running to 1,000+ pages — a process the vendor says consumes roughly half of senior engineers' review time and still lets conflicts through to become RFIs, change orders, and field rework.

The Solution

Structured AI's vision-language agents parse uploaded 2D PDF drawing sets for code/spec violations and overlay same-area sheets across disciplines (architectural over structural over MEP, auto-aligned across differing scales) to surface clashes, returning each finding with the exact page, location, rule, and a suggested fix. A Revit integration runs equivalent checks directly against the BIM model without export, reporting by element ID and level. Teams can also author custom checks in plain English (no code) and query a drawing set via chat with answers sourced to exact sheet locations.

How You Use It

Delivery Method
SaaSWeb ApplicationRevit Integration
Integrations
Autodesk RevitAutodesk Construction CloudProcoreBluebeamMicrosoft WordMicrosoft ExcelMicrosoft SharePointGoogle DriveOutlookGmail
Project Phases
Design Development, Construction Documentation
Project Types
Commercial, Residential, Infrastructure, Mixed-Use

Data Transparency

Exactly what this tool uses and how

Input
What it needs
Required:Drawing set (2D PDF)
Optional:Revit model, Compliance/code documents, Firm-specific standards documents
Formats:PDF, RVT (via Revit integration)
Output
What you get
Format:Compliance/QA findings report with page-level citations and cross-discipline clash overlays
Fields:Issue/finding description, Exact page and location reference, Applicable code/rule/spec cited, Suggested fix, Clash overlay visualization, Element IDs and levels (Revit integration)
Algorithm
How it works
Model:Proprietary computer-vision and vision-language agents (specific architecture not publicly disclosed); vendor describes outputs as deterministic pass/fail rather than confidence-scored
Accuracy:Vendor claims a 90% finding-confirmation rate by client engineers, "6x fewer field issues," and full drawing-set review in about 20 minutes; case study cites 400+ issues found in a single 1,000-page set. Methodology not independently audited.
Privacy
How your data is protected
Retention:Not publicly specified (no fixed retention period stated on vendor security page)
Training:Vendor states customer project data never trains its models; core models are trained only on curated public datasets and construction standards
Compliance:Vendor claims SOC 2 compliance (report not publicly available), Vendor claims "bank-grade encryption" (specifics not disclosed)
API
Integration
Endpoint:Not publicly documented; no self-serve developer API found
Method:Not publicly specified

Use Cases

  • ·Automated code-compliance review of MEP, structural, civil, and architectural drawing sets before issuance
  • ·Cross-discipline clash detection by overlaying architectural, structural, and MEP sheets covering the same building area
  • ·In-Revit BIM QA/QC checks reported by element ID and level without exporting the model
  • ·Chat-based Q&A over a drawing set with answers sourced to exact sheet locations
  • ·Firm-specific custom standards checks authored in plain English and run on every project

Pricing

Free
Not publicly offered; vendor directs prospects to book a demo
Pro
Contact vendor for pricing (proposals reportedly built after an initial discovery sprint, per third-party analysis)
Enterprise
Custom pricing; on-premise deployment available
Sources & Research NotesResearch date: 2026-07-17
Fields Checked (11)
problem, solution, deliveryMethod, integrations, disciplines, yearFounded, fundingTotal, customerBase (named logos), privacy-training-claim, privacy-isolation-claim, useCases
Not Found (7)
api-documentation, pricing-tiers, compliance-certification-report, accuracy-methodology-detail, data-retention-period, hosting-region, projectTypes (inferred from named customer mix, not vendor-stated)
About this research: This record summarizes the cited sources and fields checked. A research date does not establish hands-on testing. Consult the original sources for current details and limitations.