Resource search

Search DataDrivenAEC

Type at least two characters to search.

Looking for live projects? Explore open projects or browse the feed.

Open the full search page →

← All workflows

AEC workflow

Operate & Improve Assets

Move from occupied-building evidence to an owned operational action and a verified asset record.

74 resources shown.

Follow the process

How to turn asset information into an accepted operational action

Start with an asset record that the operator can trust, connect observations to that asset and create an owned action. Close work against evidence and feed the result back into the record. A dashboard signal is a reason to investigate, not automatic proof of a fault or permission to change equipment.

Your deliverable: A traceable asset-to-action record containing observations, authorized work, acceptance evidence and updated maintenance information.

Skip to the resource library ↓

Before you start

  • An asset register with identifiers, locations and an accountable operator.
  • Available handover records, operating instructions and approved measurement sources.
  • Agreed priority, access, safety and work-authorization procedures.
  • A work-order register and a named person responsible for accepting completed work.

  1. Establish the asset-information baseline

    Inputs
    Asset identifiers, locations, handover documents and current operator records.
    Action
    Match the physical asset to its record and reconcile duplicate or missing identifiers. Record document versions and unresolved fields. Check imported model information against what operations actually needs rather than accepting every field as current.
    Output
    An asset register with traceable identities, document references and assigned information gaps.
    Review checkpoint
    Can the operator identify the actual asset and distinguish verified facts from inherited assumptions?
    Common mistake
    Treating a model handover as proof that every installed asset or property is correct.

    Resources for this step

  2. Connect observations to their measurement context

    Inputs
    Meter readings, inspections, occupant reports or system observations linked to assets.
    Action
    Record the source, timestamp, unit, measurement interval and asset mapping. Check for missing data, changed sensors or unusual operating conditions before interpreting a trend. Retain observations separately from a diagnosis.
    Output
    An observation record with measurement context and flags for data or mapping uncertainty.
    Review checkpoint
    Could a change in units, coverage or operating hours explain the apparent problem?
    Common mistake
    Calling a gap or a changed measurement boundary an improvement in asset performance.

    Resources for this step

    • Gridium technology overview

      Review a vendor-documented energy-analysis option and verify the actual measurement coverage before interpreting a trend.

  3. Triage the condition and assign an investigation

    Inputs
    Contextualized observations, operator instructions and approved priority criteria.
    Action
    Assess the condition through the site’s responsible personnel and procedures. Separate a monitoring anomaly from a verified fault. Assign the next inspection or specialist review with a reason and required evidence; do not let a score authorize equipment intervention.
    Output
    An owned investigation or work request with priority, evidence needs and authorization requirements.
    Review checkpoint
    Is the requested action appropriate to the evidence, responsible role and site safety procedure?
    Common mistake
    Triggering equipment changes directly from an unverified dashboard alert.

    Resources for this step

  4. Authorize and coordinate the work

    Inputs
    Accepted investigation findings, work scope, access constraints and assigned personnel.
    Action
    Create a work order for the approved action with asset identity, responsible person and expected completion evidence. Follow the site’s access and safety requirements, including any specialist authorization. Record exceptions and changed scope rather than silently extending the instruction.
    Output
    An authorized work order with the correct asset, scope, owner and completion criteria.
    Review checkpoint
    Do the assigned people have the authority, information and site procedures needed for this work?
    Common mistake
    Treating a software task assignment as permission to perform safety-critical maintenance.

    Resources for this step

    • Facilio technology overview

      Compare a documented facility-workflow option for records and coordination; retain the site’s actual work authorization.

  5. Accept the evidence and update the asset record

    Inputs
    Work completion records, inspection evidence, revised documents and follow-up observations.
    Action
    Have the responsible person check the agreed completion evidence and note unresolved conditions. Update the asset history, documents and next maintenance action. Compare subsequent observations on a consistent basis without assuming a before-and-after difference proves causation.
    Output
    An accepted or reopened work record, updated asset information and a defined monitoring follow-up.
    Review checkpoint
    Does the evidence justify closure, and can the next operator understand what changed?
    Common mistake
    Closing the work because a task is marked complete without recording what was verified.

    Resources for this step

Worked journey: an unexpected energy trend

Synthetic training example only: the project, records and outcomes below are invented to explain the process. This is not evidence of a tested implementation, customer result or professional approval.

Asset baseline
The operator matches a meter to the asset register and notices an undocumented change in the served area.
Observation context
The apparent trend is held for investigation because the measurement boundary changed.
Triage
A responsible person assigns a metering review rather than an automatic equipment-setting change.
Work order
An approved task records the asset, qualified owner and evidence needed to confirm the mapping.
Acceptance
The corrected mapping enters the asset history. Future comparisons use the new boundary and do not claim an invented energy saving.

Asset operations and maintenance checklist

Select and copy the checklist into your project document. Complete it there; this page does not save project information.

Continue to the resource library ↓

Back to the facility operations process ↑

74 connected resources

Explore this workflow

AEC technology profiles connected to this workflow.

Workflow pick

Facilio

AI-powered CMMS and facilities management for multi-site portfolios

Open resource →Workflow pick

Gridium

AI-powered building energy management platform

Open resource →Workflow pick

Speckle

Open-source BIM collaboration and data platform

Open resource →

2050 Materials

Sustainability data platform for building materials

Open resource →

Airtable

AI-powered low-code platform for collaborative apps

Open resource →

Airteam

Drone-to-3D-model measurement platform for roofing, solar, and facade trades

Open resource →

Akular

Augmented Reality for construction site verification and collaboration

Open resource →

Aquicore

AI-powered building performance optimization platform

Open resource →

Arcalogix AI

AI-powered 3D visualization from 2D floor plans

Open resource →

ArcDox

BIM consultancy and professional services for construction projects

Open resource →

Archilogic

AI-queryable spatial data platform for enterprise buildings

Open resource →

Asite

Cloud collaboration platform for construction management

Open resource →
Browse technology directory →

A human decision first

Being data-driven goes beyond technology

It starts with good questions, trusted evidence, and clear decisions.

Book a conversation →